Liquid Network Releases Security Audit Update, Community Demands Missing Bitcoins
The Liquid Network team published an update on a security audit and the PAK list update, which is responsible for the peg-out process that allows Bitcoin to be withdrawn from Liquid and returned to the Bitcoin network.
However, in the comments, the community is demanding a position from the developers regarding the 602 missing bitcoins in the backing of Liquid Bitcoin (L-BTC).
The project suffered a hacker attack on September 6, losing around 4,000 bitcoins. Later, the hacker returned a large portion of that amount, but ended up keeping 600 bitcoins in their wallet.
This sum could be interpreted as a reward from Blockstream, responsible for the development of Liquid, for returning most of the funds. However, both parties dispute this amount.
Liquid Publishes New Update on Network Status
Although Liquid has resumed operations, allowing transactions of assets other than L-BTC, the peg-out process for these coins remains stalled after three weeks.
On social media, the project team published an update on the progress of security checks. "An external and independent security audit of Elements v23.3.4 is already underway, providing an additional layer of validation as we work to safely restore peg-out operations. Meanwhile, the Liquid Federation is coordinating an update of the PAK list, including replacing existing entries and ensuring that all peg-out keys are properly secured in cold storage. These efforts are important steps to safely resume peg-out operations. We hope to share new updates on the recovery process soon."
Liquid Network Receives Independent Audit and PAK List Update. Source: X.
Liquid Users Demand Developers' Position on the 600 Missing Bitcoins in the Protocol
At the time of this writing, Liquid's own website shows that the project maintains 4,234 L-BTC in circulation against only 3,632 bitcoins in its wallets. In other words, more than three weeks after the attack, over 600 bitcoins that back L-BTC are still missing.
Liquid Still Has Not Resolved the Backing Issue of Its Currency, L-BTC. Source: Liquid Network/Reproduction.
In the comments of the above tweet, several followers questioned the developers' stance on this matter.
"It has been over 3 weeks since the hack and there has been no announcement saying that 'the funds are safe'. You insist on recovering 600 BTC from the hacker, but you have no control over them. What is your plan B or C? Is my money safe? Please respond in simple language," wrote one user.
"OK, that's great. Now, any update on the parity between L-BTC and BTC?" questioned a second.
So far, Blockstream is pressuring the hacker to return the remaining funds. However, due to the lack of cooperation, it is possible that the company will need to seek these coins through other means.
-- Price
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Bernstein Interpretation: Consumer-Level Agents Have Become a Trend, Who is Most at Risk in the Financial Industry?

Bitcoin and Asch's Experiment: The Power of Monetary Consensus

Block Festa 2026 to Open Tomorrow in Yeouido: Digital Asset Investment Institutions and Domestic and International Leaders Gather

$1 Billion in Revenue! How Collector Crypt Dominates On-Chain Card Games?

BTCS Completes Compliance Steps for DeFi Liquidity in Tokenized Stocks

Blockworks Launches On-Chain Intelligence Product Intel Integrating Messari Data

Spanish Civil Guard Investigates Scam Involving Fake Cryptocurrency Investments

Seven Intriguing Details from Anthropic's IPO Prospectus

Has the U.S. Government's Attitude Toward Cryptocurrency Changed After the CLARITY Act Vote Failed?

ATOM Price Prediction October 2026: Can Cosmos Break $1.80?

Who Defines Ethereum? Cultural Convergence and the Truth of Cryptocurrency

Spain says self custody crypto does not need Form 721 reporting

Federal Reserve Refines Stablecoin Regulation Draft: 1:1 Reserves, Two-Day Redemption, and Weekly Reporting

Is it worth participating in Jumper's new token offering after raising $52 million?

Circle Freezes Approximately $201,000 of Stolen Funds from Bitget

IRS Targets Crypto ETFs Over Tax Compliance Issues

Why Is Quant (QNT) Price Rising? The Clearing House Tokenized Deposit Deal Explained
Why is Quant (QNT) rising? Explore The Clearing House tokenized deposit deal, QNT utility, price risks and how to trade QNT on WEEX.

Ukraine ranks 7th globally in cryptocurrency usage, Chainalysis report
Why Is Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Up Today? New AI Agent Safety Platform Fuels the Rally
Why is Nvidia stock up today? Explore the AI agent safety launch, Nvidia’s growth outlook, key risks and how the NVDA token works on WEEX.

Bitcoin: A Computing Token Network to Protect Against AI Misuse?

Belarus Registers First Two Crypto Banks as High-Tech Park Enterprises

Why Is No One Buying Spot Stocks While Leverage Is Exploding in U.S. Stocks on the Blockchain?

QQQ Price Prediction for October 2026: Can It Break $750?

The SEC Publishes a New Crypto FAQ - What Does It Imply?

Bitwise Keeps XRP ETF Filing Updated, But Green Light Still Missing

Blockchain: IBM Connects Its Digital Asset Platform to Swift's Ledger

XPL Price Prediction 2026: Can Plasma Reach $0.15 After Unlock?

Stablecoins and Tokenized Deposits: Banks Could Lose $230 Billion

El Salvador Residency: The New Frontier of Financial Freedom










